I actually came across the expanded version of this article they showed on the News At Ten last night, and it was overwhelmingly negative...
From things like some guy saying his 13 yr old had been admitted to hospital for some lung condition "he thought was connected to vaping", and while being interviewed in a darkened room, he was talking about his "addicted son" like he was on crack or something...
To Prof Ann McNeil, one of the co-authors of the original 2015 report, being interviewed and being made to literally squirm in her chair about the "95% less harmful" tag.. something she then back-peddled on, saying "it is out of date"... (Huh?)
And the main guy ("expert") Dr Mike McKean, the way he said - "There are many children, young people who have taken up vaping who never intended to smoke and are now likely addicted to vaping. And I think it's absolutely shocking that we've allowed that to happen."
Well, for starters, where is your evidence that a significant proportion "never intended to smoke"...
.. and short of having prohibition in the form of some kind of extremely authoritarian totalitarian state, how would it have even been possible to stop some kids trying it? (whether shocking or not)
I tell you, more & more I simply think they have got it in for vaping (and vapers)...