What's new

Weight of VG?

Try not to worry too much.

I see, this time you have not only edited my post, but also changed it so that it reads completely different, :lies:

Just to remind you, and for the benefit of other people reading this thread, below is the original message I posted.

My mind is always at ease friend. :)

Whilst yours always seems troubled young man.:hmm:

You should try to relax more. :cool:

Is that the best you can do, it's rather a pathetic thing to try, it really shows the lack of intellectual thought that you have, some might call it a stupid schoolboy type of prank.

I suggest you cease from doing this in future. :23:
I mean you tried it a couple of times last year if you remember.
I warned you, but you did it again.
Backfired though, did it not, I simply altered one of yours slightly, it was a masterpiece, much better than your attempts. :)
I remember you getting quite agitated over it. :18:
Again just to remind yourself, and for the benefit, and amusement of other members reading this, when I finished with yours it appeared that you were a bisexual, that enjoyed anal sex. :18:

I started out in the new year by promising to be nice to you, but you appear to have thrown down the gauntlet again.
Do you dislike me for some reason ?
Matters little really, I suppose. :)

Earlier in this thread you accused me of derailing it, by making a few jokes about the coefficient of thermal expansion. I started to continue on the original subject of the OP, and now you derail the thread again with this load of crap !!!!! :offtopic:

I would politely suggest that you do not indulge in this practice again, otherwise I will consider it as open warfare. :gunban:
I mean, it does not particularly perturb me, but you seem to get quite wound up by things, so it is inevitable that you would come out as the loser again. :)

Anyway @zouzounaki sweet dreams, and try to get some relaxation, and calmness into your life, I worry the way you go on that you might have a stroke, or something. :10:
 
@Leni @Rickster @StrawberryRipple @RAPTOREX @Richard Winter

Good evening all, following the short humorous interlude, back to the original subject.

One thing we have not touched on in our discussions on density / viscosity of liquids is Aqueous VG.
The problem with this is that suppliers do not put density figures on their product description.
Coupled with the fact that I have recently noticed that some are not even stating the percentage of water that has been mixed with the VG.

Obviously this is an important factor in even our own small mixes, let alone industrial sized.

Last year someone that I knew made large mixes, as he had a lot of friends he supplied.
A couple of his recipes needed to use Aqueous VG as a lot of the customers who liked it preferred their juice to be low in PG, but thin enough to wick in a stock coil tank.
So he contacted me for some advice as he knew I had made quite a few mixes with Aqueous VG (in fact I think it was myself who introduced him to it).
His problem was that he had purchased some new materials, started to mix one of his standard recipes, and now had something that seem closer to water than juice in his mixing pot.
I said simple, just add some more VG till it seems to be the same viscosity as the other batches you have done.
He said, hesaid I might just ditch this, and start again, I will need to buy some VG whatever, as I now have 5 litres of this shit in a bucket. :17:

Hence now if I want thinner juice, rather than using Aqueous VG, I use normal VG, and add a percentage if Pharma grade water. :)

As I say this was a year or so ago, but since then I have noticed companies advertising Aqueous VG, but with percentages of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and some not even stating what the percentage is.

So if you do ever use it, make sure exactly what you are buying. :)
 
@Leni @Rickster @StrawberryRipple @RAPTOREX @Richard Winter

Good evening all, following the short humorous interlude, back to the original subject.

One thing we have not touched on in our discussions on density / viscosity of liquids is Aqueous VG.
The problem with this is that suppliers do not put density figures on their product description.
Coupled with the fact that I have recently noticed that some are not even stating the percentage of water that has been mixed with the VG.

Obviously this is an important factor in even our own small mixes, let alone industrial sized.

Last year someone that I knew made large mixes, as he had a lot of friends he supplied.
A couple of his recipes needed to use Aqueous VG as a lot of the customers who liked it preferred their juice to be low in PG, but thin enough to wick in a stock coil tank.
So he contacted me for some advice as he knew I had made quite a few mixes with Aqueous VG (in fact I think it was myself who introduced him to it).
His problem was that he had purchased some new materials, started to mix one of his standard recipes, and now had something that seem closer to water than juice in his mixing pot.
I said simple, just add some more VG till it seems to be the same viscosity as the other batches you have done.
He said, hesaid I might just ditch this, and start again, I will need to buy some VG whatever, as I now have 5 litres of this shit in a bucket. :17:

Hence now if I want thinner juice, rather than using Aqueous VG, I use normal VG, and add a percentage if Pharma grade water. :)

As I say this was a year or so ago, but since then I have noticed companies advertising Aqueous VG, but with percentages of 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and some not even stating what the percentage is.

So if you do ever use it, make sure exactly what you are buying. :)
The specific gravity of VG is 1.26 and the specific gravity of water is 1 so hopefully if we know the percentage of water in the VG we will know the overall gravity of the combined mix.

My son uses 10% distilled water in VG but does also buy AVG, i will have to ask him what percentage the mix ratio is on what he buys.
 
Back
Top Bottom