- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
- Messages
- 27,538
I look at it like thisMore like non-existent. Or faux-existent - even worse because I had to complete their stupiddamnstupid form with all the parcel codes and explanations each time.
It's whoever has contracted the courier I believe. Making them legally responsible for items in their care is intuitively appealing, especially if you've lost a bunch of stuff. But do we really want that?
Most couriers do offer insurance, but it's not cheap, and I think that explains why it's not mandatory (the inevitable price rise due to couriers becoming legally responsible for items in their care is essentially mandating that customers insure every parcel).
if you employ a plumber to go round your mums and fix the khazi .... and he fucks it up, smashes her down pipe and looses the toilet roll - who should be responsible ? the plumber or you ?