Enoch
Achiever
- Joined
- Apr 20, 2015
- Messages
- 2,295
I refer to the flu now because it has significantly overtaken covid in this country for the last 4 months.If Covid is a new disease (i.e. not the flu) we will have no natural immunity to it - the fact that flu figures are low clearly shows that the restrictions greatly reduced the Covid infections and subsequent death rate.
It is possible to have Covid and Flu simultaneously - I dont know why you feel this is relevant.
Nobody is going fo FORCE us to wear masks - again I don't know why you ask. If you feel that strongly about the subject you probably aren't complying now, but I don't understand why you feel it would do you any harm if people continued to use masks after the 19th. We don't live in a Dictatorship, although it is fun to describe it as one, personally I believe it should be at the discretion of individual businesses if they require masks etc. on their premises, the only stumbling block there would be those that believe this would restrict their personal freedom (because their freedom should involve them being free to do whatever they want on someone elses property - and not allowing them to dictate terms would invoke the Karen clause of 'discrimination')
Nobody has yet attempted to explain to me why those who are against covid constantly refer to the flu, a different, less infectious disease with a much lower mortality rate. that normally results in far fewer hospitalisations.
I'm just glad the medical services can differentiate between the two diseases or we would all be truly fucked.
In terms of the masks , they aren't being left under personal choice , despite the government saying so. There are plenty of places all over the country making them mandatory on their own backs, hence why they can't be stopped, individual areas have implemented them.
Flu rates and covid rates weren't proportional at all, as the media keep telling us rates are as high now as they were 4 weeks into a lockdown. Which begs the question, if transmission rates are the same without restrictions as they are with a full country lockdown, then given people have the jab, you can't prevent it then can you?
Having flu and covid in the body is extremely relevant actually. Because if someone did have both , they would only be tested for one , therefore the other would be 'undetected' in that scenario. Which makes the 95% reduced flu rates extremely misleading.
You assume I am not conforming yet I have followed every single step along the way. I had the same experience as everyone else , worked all day in masks , travelled in masks , shop in masks etc. That is a funny misconception I see online towards others , the you must not be following the rules if you don't agree with X or Y.
Finally you seem to have flooded over what I said about people wearing masks, there is nothing wrong with wearing them at personal choice, but they are being forced into people none the less against the government instructions.
So kinda ironic that the government that is backed by SAGE says one thing about masks, individual mayor's without SAGE say another and people side with the without side on the subject , but then also side against WHO as well.